Saturday, 27 December 2014

Oh, the depths of WW2 geekery...

As part of my regular Xmas I normally get a WW2 aircraft print calendar. This years has some cracking art in it and having an admiring look through it tonight on my return home, I came across this:


Spot the mistake!!!

(I did immediately, resulting in loud sighs from A - 'does it really matter??' says she - all I could do was splutter in outrage and defence! Still unsure whether to write to the maker!!! Imagine getting one of my favourite planes wrong!)

7 comments:

  1. interesting - not a plane i'm over familiar with so it looks ok at a glance. I've had a look on the net and couldn't find one with the same nose, so please spill the beens.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Dannoc, The aircraft in the picture is a Bristol Beaufighter, not a Bristol Beaufort. Similar names - and with at times similar roles, but different aircraft. The Beaufighter was a twin engined 'heavy fighter'. A superb ground or sea attack aircraft that could carry torpedoes, rockets, bombs and was normally armed with 4 x 20mm cannon and 6 x .303 machine guns. The Beaufort was a naval attack bomber and recon aircraft. It could carry bombs and torps but was much more of a light bomber like the Blenheim, it normally only carried between 3 and 7 .303 machine guns depending on the model - normally only for self defence.

    Beaufighter: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_Beaufighter
    Beaufort: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_Beaufort

    In short, that's the wrong plane in the picture. A bit like mixing up a Spitfire and a Hurricane or a Lancaster and a B17. Just WW2 planes to the general public, but like mixing up a Nissan Micra and a Ford Focus to most WW2 geeks (or at least, British WW2 geeks! - Japanese planes are all the same to me!)

    ReplyDelete
  3. with you now. I've heard of both planes but wouldn't have been able to pick one from the other (though I've a better chance now after looking at your links - thanks) - you think they should have the identification right.

    ReplyDelete
  4. O the outrage! :)

    Am with you though, if you're going to publish a calendar with blurb below, at least make sure the bloody thing's accurate!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly!!! I've now got to look at their mistake for a whole month!!!

      Delete
  5. Im not a plane buff myself but agreed they should know there stuff, but on the up side you've got a really great blog here nice picks
    Cheers
    Kent

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Kent,

    Thanks very much! Picture quality is something I'm steadily working on. I'm really needing a light box - but my painting quality needs to be better for that ;)

    ReplyDelete

Please feel free to leave a comment - it will appear once moderated! Thanks!